Re: 2.1.1-BETA schema problems

[Andrew Davison <andrew@infradig.com>]

using the 2.1 schema files, as i said, slapdadd compiled in 2.1 says
'bad configuration file' (even when using the supplied slapd.conf in
'server/slapd'). i was trying to determine what that was referring to
when used the 2.0 compiled slapadd, a mistake i now realize, as i was
forgetting that openldap changes schema code like most people change socks.

but getting back to the 2.1. schema files. back in the old days (2.0.23)
'surname' declared it was SUP from 'name' and there actually was a
definition for 'name'. in 2.1 i can't find it. is there now a secret 
core schema that we can only guess at?

Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:

> Sounds like you are 2.0 .schema files with 2.1.  You need to
> use the .schema files distributed with 2.1 as the content
> has changed due to new system schema checking code.
>
> At 08:33 PM 2002-04-25, Andrew Davison wrote:
>
>>is it just me or is the core.schema file inconsistent? specifically 
'sn' has a dependendancy on 'name' which is not defined. the later entry 
for 'name' has been commented out with a note saying it's been up moved 
up earlier in the file, but obviously has not. fixing that just showed 
up other errors.
>>
>>i only discovered this by running the old 2.0.23 'slapadd' program, 
the one in 2.1.1-BETA just says 'bad configuration file'.
>>
>>
>