> > this is a bad assumption. ldif2ldbm should not assume the data is valid. I'd tend to agree. Perhaps there needs to be a ldif schema checking tool? > > You don't want to have ldif2ldbm check schema, because if it > did, it's be > > much slower. > > if ldif2ldbm doesn't check schema, how is schema checking being enforced? slapd does it. -- Roy Hooper Sr. Systems Administrator Cyberus Online Inc. (613) 233-0068