Full_Name: Ian Logan Version: devel OS: freebsd URL: ftp://acca.nmsu.edu/pub/ian/ian-logan-200806.tar Submission from: (NULL) (128.123.210.144) This set of patches allow devel to build with BerkeleyDB 3.1 (the API changed again) I've tested the patches on FreeBSD 4.1 with both bdb 3.0 and 3.1. In both cases slapd passes all of its tests. There are two patches inside the tar (build.patch and lib.patch) build.patch fixes the HAVE_DB_THREAD test inside of configure, and lib.patch fixes libldbm. The patches are against devel as of this afternoon.
Fixed, please test, thanks. Kurt At 01:28 AM 8/7/00 +0000, ian@nmsu.edu wrote: >Full_Name: Ian Logan >Version: devel >OS: freebsd >URL: ftp://acca.nmsu.edu/pub/ian/ian-logan-200806.tar >Submission from: (NULL) (128.123.210.144) > > >This set of patches allow devel to build with BerkeleyDB 3.1 (the API changed >again) >I've tested the patches on FreeBSD 4.1 with both bdb 3.0 and 3.1. >In both cases slapd passes all of its tests. >There are two patches inside the tar (build.patch and lib.patch) >build.patch fixes the HAVE_DB_THREAD test inside of configure, >and lib.patch fixes libldbm. > >The patches are against devel as of this afternoon.
The patches I submitted didn't update configure itself. So I had to run autoconf, no big deal. Should I have included a patch against configure, or should people run autoconf? I just want to get it right in the future. THanks, Ian "Kurt D. Zeilenga" wrote: > > Fixed, please test, thanks. > > Kurt > > At 01:28 AM 8/7/00 +0000, ian@nmsu.edu wrote: > >Full_Name: Ian Logan > >Version: devel > >OS: freebsd > >URL: ftp://acca.nmsu.edu/pub/ian/ian-logan-200806.tar > >Submission from: (NULL) (128.123.210.144) > > > > > >This set of patches allow devel to build with BerkeleyDB 3.1 (the API changed > >again) > >I've tested the patches on FreeBSD 4.1 with both bdb 3.0 and 3.1. > >In both cases slapd passes all of its tests. > >There are two patches inside the tar (build.patch and lib.patch) > >build.patch fixes the HAVE_DB_THREAD test inside of configure, > >and lib.patch fixes libldbm. > > > >The patches are against devel as of this afternoon. -- Ian Logan Computing & Networking New Mexico State University Email: ian@nmsu.edu Phone: 505-646-6034 Fax: 505-646-5278
At 12:15 PM 8/7/00 -0600, Ian Logan wrote: >The patches I submitted didn't update configure itself. So I had to run >autoconf, no big deal. Should I have included a patch against >configure, or should people run autoconf? I just want to get it right >in the future. The committer should have regenerated the configure script. Done. Kurt
changed notes changed state Open to Closed moved from Incoming to Development
applied